Motion For Mac Vs Adobe
I'll skip out on the concept of how 'professional' the apps in question are. Honestly, I just don't think that's the most relevant argument.
Either package can certainly produce 'professional' results - but this is all semantics. But, I will add that, IMHO, AE is simply more mature than Motion. I'll give credit where it's due: Motion has come a very long way for an app that's only at v.3. However, the devil's in the details, and there are things that you can do in AE that you can't do in Motion. But I can't think of anything that Motion can do, that AE can't. If they exist, I'd like to hear them. The expressions in AE are very powerful!
Motion For Mac Vs Adobe Acrobat
A couple of lines of script can create some intricate animations. The Puppet Tool in AE is really cool, and is only going to get better.
If you're a Photoshop user, your 'Layer Styles' can be imported straight into AE - or created from scratch in AE, w/o Photoshop, if need be. (Basically since we're talking about 2 Adobe products, the integration between Photoshop & AE is way more advanced than the integration between Photoshop & Motion. And likely always will be.) These are just a few points: this is, by no means, an exhaustive list. Too, there are more plug-ins available for AE. Although the gap seems to be closing (due in part to the FXPlug technology) there are some cool plug-ins that AE has access to that Motion does not.
The form creation process feels easier and more intuitive than that of Google Forms. Cons Expensive: After a 30-day trial you can choose to purchase a continual license of Adobe Acrobat Pro for $199, or you can become a subscriber for $19.99 a month, to enjoy additional online features. Students and teachers can purchase a continual license for the discounted price of $119. You can choose to either edit one of many templates, or you can create your own forms from scratch. Adobe acrobat pro x for mac.
In this article we will be examining how the top-end Mac Pro (late 2013) compares to one of our After Effects workstations. This system was designed based on our extensive testing of After Effects and represents both a great value (priced at just over half the cost of the Mac Pro) as well as giving excellent performance in After Effects.
Everyone seems to think AE is so hard to learn. I don't really get that, personally. Sure, it can be a little daunting in the beginning. But how can something that can create such complex results not have, at least, some level of a learning curve. But if you read the and/or do all the at Lynda.com, you'll find yourself quite savvy! Oh.and folks, don't be so afraid of keyframes. They are your friend!
Just my $.02 worth. I used FCE for a few years and bought Motion 2 seperately.
But while I was happy with FCE I was always missing something that Final Cut Pro had that FCE did not. Maybe because I was getting more work than hobby videos to edit / compose. But I found that I really wanted Motion 3 so I spent the money and am very happy with the product. I use both After Effects CS3 and Motion 3. I am finding however, that my workflow centers around using only Final Cut and Motion 3. I am even using Motion 3 for alot of Flash work ( converting the.mov with On2 Fix Pro ).